Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision
Previous revision
|
|
null_results [2026/03/19 00:23] Ludo Fraser-Taliente [subsec 1] The minimal models are hard to find. |
null_results [2026/03/19 00:24] (current) Ludo Fraser-Taliente |
| One might want to find the unitary [[minimal models | minimal models]] $\mathcal{M}_{m+1,m}$ in a controlled fashion by considering the fixed point of the $\frac{1}{2}(\partial \phi)^2 + g \phi^{2(m-1)}$ QFT in a Wilson-Fisher-like perturbative expansion around $d=d_c -\epsilon$, where $d_c = 2(m-1)/(m-2)$. | One might want to find the unitary [[minimal models | minimal models]] $\mathcal{M}_{m+1,m}$ in a controlled fashion by considering the fixed point of the $\frac{1}{2}(\partial \phi)^2 + g \phi^{2(m-1)}$ QFT in a Wilson-Fisher-like perturbative expansion around $d=d_c -\epsilon$, where $d_c = 2(m-1)/(m-2)$. |
| Unforunately, even in the large-$m$ limit, $d=2$ is too far away from $d_c$ to have perturbative control in $\epsilon$, as described in [[http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26372 | section 2.4 of this paper]]. | Unforunately, even in the large-$m$ limit, $d=2$ is too far away from $d_c$ to have perturbative control in $\epsilon$, as described in [[http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26372 | section 2.4 of this paper]]. |
| ====subsubsec 1==== | |
| |
| ====etc.==== | |