This is an old revision of the document!
A classification of possible superconformal algebras was given by Nahm in 1977. The outline of the argument is as follows:
The algebras to the right of the $\supset$ denote the maximal bosonic subalgebra. We can see that they each contain the conformal algebra $\mathfrak{so}(d, 2)$, as required by (a). The fact that the list truncates at $d = 6$ is essentially due to assumption $(b)$. Of all the simple superalgebras, only $\mathfrak{f}(4)$ has an odd part which transforms in a spinorial representation. However, in low dimension, there exist exceptional isomorphisms between lie algebras. This allows, for example, the vector of $\mathfrak{usp}(4)$ to be interpreted as the spinor of $\mathfrak{so}(5)$, which is exactly what is required to ensure that the odd part of the $d = 3$ algebra is spinorial (see section 4 of Minwalla for further discussion on this point]] . In addition to assumptions (a) and (b), this result relies on a sort of unitarity assumption– specifically, we must assume that there is a positive definite inner product on the algebra.