Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- superconformal_field_theory [2021/04/06 22:06]
Brian McPeak
+++ — (current)
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-==== Classification of superconformal algebras ====
-A classification of possible superconformal algebras was given by [[https://inspirehep.net/literature/120988|Nahm]] in 1977. The outline of the argument is as follows:
-  - Consider a superalgebra $L = g_0 \oplus g_1$, where $g_0$ and $g_1$ denote the even and odd part of the superalgebra, respectively
-  - Prove that $L$ must be simple
-  - The list of simple superalgebras is known. We select from the list the algebras satisfying (a) $g_0$ contains the conformal algebra $so(d, 2)$ and (b) $g_1$ transforms in a spinorial representation of the SC
-  - the result is the following classification: \begin{align}
-d = 3: & \qquad \mathfrak{osp}(\mathcal{N}|4) \ \supset \  \mathfrak{so}(3,2) \times  \mathfrak{so}(\mathcal{N})_R \, ,       \\
-d = 4: & \qquad \mathfrak{su}(2,2| \mathcal{N}) \ \supset \ \mathfrak{so}(4,2) \times  \mathfrak{su}(\mathcal{N})_R \times \mathfrak{u}(1)_R \, ,           \\
-d = 5: & \qquad \mathfrak{f}(4) \ \supset \   \mathfrak{so}(5,2) \times  \mathfrak{su}(2)_R \, ,   (\text{requires} \mathcal{N} = 1)        \\
-d = 6: & \qquad \mathfrak{osp}(6,2| \mathcal{N}) \ \supset \
- \end{align}
-The algebras to the right of the $\supset$ denote the maximal bosonic subalgebra. We can see that they each contain the conformal algebra $\mathfrak{so}(d, 2)$, as required by (a).  In addition to assumptions (a) and (b), this result relies on a sort of unitarity assumption-- specifically, we must assume that there is a positive definite inner product on the algebra.

CFT Zoo

Page Tools

Site Tools

User Tools

Differences