This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
list_of_cfts [2021/04/13 15:44] Scott Lawrence [Fractional dimensions] |
list_of_cfts [2021/09/14 01:58] (current) Brian McPeak [Two dimensions] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
===== Two dimensions ===== | ===== Two dimensions ===== | ||
- | [[2d CFTs]] are the best understood class of CFTs, due to their larger [[Virasoro symmetries]] | + | [[2d CFTs]] are the best understood class of CFTs, due to their larger [[Virasoro symmetries]]. 2d CFTs differ based on their central charge; those with $c<1$ comprise considerably simpler class of [[minimal models]]. |
- | [[Minimal Models]] | + | {{topic> |
- | * [[2d Ising]] | + | Those with $c>1$ are more complicated and in general are not fully classified yet. |
- | * All the others | + | |
- | + | ||
- | [[Narain Theories]] | + | |
{{topic> | {{topic> | ||
Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
{{topic> | {{topic> | ||
===== Four dimensions ===== | ===== Four dimensions ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
{{topic> | {{topic> | ||
Line 57: | Line 58: | ||
===== Fractional dimensions ===== | ===== Fractional dimensions ===== | ||
- | These apparently exist, even nonperturbatively. What's the conformal symmetry group? | + | These apparently exist, even nonperturbatively. What's the conformal symmetry group? |
Here's an example of the Ising model on the Sierpinski carpet: [[https:// | Here's an example of the Ising model on the Sierpinski carpet: [[https:// | ||
Here's some bootstrap work: [[https:// | Here's some bootstrap work: [[https:// |