This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
list_of_cfts [2021/04/10 23:31] Scott Lawrence [Six dimensions] |
list_of_cfts [2026/03/05 16:00] (current) Ludo Fraser-Taliente [One dimension] |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== List of CFTs ====== | ====== List of CFTs ====== | ||
| - | Here is a list of CFTs. They are organized by dimension. Note that some CFTs, like the gaussian theories and [[percolation|percolation]], | + | Here is a list of CFTs. They are organized by dimension. Note that some CFTs, like the [[gaussian|gaussian theories]] and [[percolation|percolation]], |
| Some special classes of CFTs: | Some special classes of CFTs: | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ===== One dimension ===== | ===== One dimension ===== | ||
| - | In 1d, the conformal Ward identity $T_\mu{}^\mu = 0$ implies $T_{00} = H = 0$. Therefore quantum systems which truly respect conformal invariance are non-local | + | In 1d, the conformal Ward identity $T_\mu{}^\mu = 0$ implies $T_{00} = H = 0$. Therefore quantum systems which truly respect conformal invariance are [[list_of_cfts# |
| {{topic> | {{topic> | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| ===== Two dimensions ===== | ===== Two dimensions ===== | ||
| - | [[2d CFTs]] are the best understood class of CFTs, due to their larger [[Virasoro symmetries]] | + | [[2d CFTs]] are the best understood class of CFTs, due to their larger [[Virasoro symmetries]]. 2d CFTs differ based on their central charge; those with $c<1$ comprise considerably simpler class of [[minimal models]]. |
| - | [[Minimal Models]] | + | {{topic> |
| - | * [[2d Ising]] | + | Those with $c>1$ are more complicated and in general are not fully classified yet. |
| - | * All the others | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | [[Narain Theories]] | + | |
| {{topic> | {{topic> | ||
| Line 34: | Line 31: | ||
| {{topic> | {{topic> | ||
| ===== Four dimensions ===== | ===== Four dimensions ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| {{topic> | {{topic> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 56: | ||
| - | ===== Fractional | + | ===== Fractional/continuous dimension |
| - | These apparently exist, even nonperturbatively. What's the conformal symmetry group? | + | Non-chiral CFTs can often be defined in continuous dimension $d$, though they are usually explicilty non-unitary for noninteger $d$ due to evanescent operators that have negative norm [[https:// |
| + | |||
| + | These CFTs apparently exist, even nonperturbatively. What's the conformal symmetry group? | ||
| Here's an example of the Ising model on the Sierpinski carpet: [[https:// | Here's an example of the Ising model on the Sierpinski carpet: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Here's some bootstrap work: [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | There is a possible connection to non-conformal D$p$-brane holography [[http:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Nonlocal CFTs ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | It is possible to define quantum field theories with full SO$(d+1,1)$ symmetry that do not have a local action (i.e. $S= \int d^d x O(x)$ for some local operator $x$). These are called nonlocal CFTs, long-range CFTs, or just Conformal Theories (CTs). | ||
| + | |||
| + | The simplest example of these are the [[gaussian|generalized free fields]] (GFFs, also called mean field theory), which are Gaussian: we declare one field to have a conformal two-point function, and then determine all other correlators by the usual Wick contractions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | By perturbing one of these GFFs $\phi$ of arbitrary scaling dimension $\Delta$ by $\phi^4$ and tuning to the critical point, we can construct the the long-range Ising CFT in arbitrary dimension $d$. | ||
| + | The long-range Ising CFT becomes the standard Ising CFT (+ a decoupled free field) in the limit $\Delta \to \Delta_{\phi, | ||
| + | |||
| + | From the perspective of conformal data, the signal that these theories are nonlocal is that they do not possess a local stress tensor. That is, in the OPE of these theories there is no conserved spin-2 operator. This is reasonable because the stress tensor is an operator measuring the response of the theory to a change of the geometry. If the theory is nonlocal, then the response will not be local, so $T^{\mu\nu}$ cannot be a local operator. | ||